From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Oct 28 13:17:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62AA44686F for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CLpz34X4Bz461Q for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([178.12.38.125]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MLRDv-1kpZ2917bv-00IVtg; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:17:46 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:17:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Arthur Chance Cc: Ralf Mardorf , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-Id: <20201028141745.0ad98a8d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20201024123148.4929fb9e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20201028073644.52fed6c6@archlinux> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7kkH2VJwBv0QK8IkkMPhNWg+CI5mjmhsWFedqMIEdkSA6aB1vtt I9zs0nA10hsymm8ZHPfBhf+migv01D4X4I7ivosFSGDkBkAHngR6L9cctZ/ZTLE7T798kHx eXN33eUuVukJun4NAfudKbb1LWZAtNLSEW7hkiUYD1XrKmkWZiDoxo1NyE8UWt5amYSUO9X pC0a/ZY0wdleAvLnUUN2w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:M1nDs1stzoU=:xHi0fLWTjemDxWGZNWMhMx Ds5hB2q0+BQFLgjnffHEvBHz1y0p0UsD22/wEaHFMEhyg4khaAo2NZpTiQmSnbojVXttt3xL+ EY5U3wvKjD8J34DpZax7wbMoG3b8iF5Pl2ppgPfwss8zcRUMai9UCzaw3fAG3qiYlMz88OnVp LnB7wci2NtcPMlLx+qjI7+2bRUFaftmzIegbb3eMwvTAd+cvBZqzRLGS6hbTNOMf81q68uh2N o75iE9UB7td7kl4Ju+25b5jaOem0XqGGP8QX0vhczwyEdPM/LkpKaY+0aHeMw4oIOYdqFw01r 8EJRfOqzm/VLOgaLOXXnzhTg7vRT7xVIP/Em1FcZaYs0NvVtURceytloR//zI25mc1G9LQodm I2STPwdTEYze8AVnAeDEInA6PXc2oswxXNkxPwTV/NrfI4mLq8ZRACEGIhllf X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CLpz34X4Bz461Q X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.126.130) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.47 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.21)[-0.213]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[178.12.38.125:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.19)[-0.190]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.53)[-0.530]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.126.130:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 13:17:52 -0000 On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:11:10 +0000, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 28/10/2020 06:36, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > [...] > > In the end you need to read a lot of papers and decide on your own what > > is "the best" for you or in your opinion. > > And know that will change a few months later anyway. :-) If you are lucky (and do your homework!), you should be able to settle for hardware that will work good for a long time, rather than buying something for $$$$$ that is "the best" for two weeks, then discovered as having faulty firmware, and break & brick entirely after 6 months... ;-) Personally, I prefer "good for a long time" over "best for a short time", but for whatever you decide, the moment you make the choice, there will be new options for (probably) better choices, and if it's just "the same for less money". So in the end, you'll have something that works, but be angry because you could have had something better for less money. Researching and buying hardware is no fun anymore. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...