From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 19 09:39:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C5E16A41F for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:39:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from smtp06.wanadoo.nl (smtp06.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EDD43D45 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:39:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johan.spee@wanadoo.nl) Received: from coonsden1 (adsl-dc-45560.adsl.wanadoo.nl [83.118.243.96]) by smtp6.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A3745F5E for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:39:09 +0100 (CET) From: Johan Spee To: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:39:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20051119103922.754231@coonsden1> In-Reply-To: <44lkznfj8c.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-Gratia: Eve ryth ingis gon nabeal right Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Everything on FAT is executable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Johan Spee List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:39:11 -0000 Hi Lowell, Thanks for your answer. It took me a while to respond because the message ended op on the Windows hemisphere of my pc. I also wanted to figure out what 'octal code' should be added to the -m parameter. I still don't understand the principle but '-m 333' should allow rw for all and mask x. I added this to my fstab, but the result is that the drives are no longer mounted. I'll have to look into that. thanks again, -Jay On 17 Nov 2005 09:21:23 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > mount_msdosfs(8) has a -m option (and -M, so you can still have the > directories executable) to change the observed permissions. It's > an all-or-nothing solution, but that's probably what you want > anyway.