From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Fri Dec 20 01:42:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313F21C85C3 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47fBMg0cXcz4Kk6 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1505A1C85C0; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: python@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CBB1C85BF for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47fBMf6tckz4Kk5 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7BDC1F8C5 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBK1gs9p085787 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBK1gsSt085786 for python@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 242672] science/py-scikit-learn: Fails due to unresolved symbols (py36-scikit-learn-0.20.3_1) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:42:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D242672 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |merge-quarterly? Depends on| |238718 --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #5) Thank you Andy :) "I can confirm that it works as intended and does not throw the error menti= oned before." That's good, we can set this issue to depend on bug 238718 as the update includes something that presumably resolves the bug, unless this is incorre= ct (please let us know). "This step was actually not necessary. Should I test it regardless? Yes please, because conversely, if the update doesn't (actually, either way= ), this will highlight LDFLAGS=3D-lblas removal in previous revisions are a contributor, if not cause of the issue. As such, we could resolve the issue with reverting that removal, separately from any version update, which we prefer, as bugfixes can go to the quarter= ly branches, whereas there's less of an appetite to merge version updates to quarterly. "should I test it instead of building from the Ports Collection as well? " Since packages are just precompiled ports, a (runtime) verified ports build also verifies the package runtime that will come once the port is updated Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238718 [Bug 238718] science/py-scikit-learn: Update to 0.22.0 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=