From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  2 07:19:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CA862B
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Dec 2014 07:19:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E507AD0D
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Dec 2014 07:19:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e131so8724326oig.24
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:19:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=YADbRLCV5i+Y6PZgLSkeeRjHjBhuyzQiq+MENXMa8ME=;
 b=vUosPa5zi5M0sQQGLe+AdcTFjVmMJRFo6hTOBo0P2s+O/hYsJWbRI7F4gynKVBS1tG
 IH34yjDPgOyGJ4XUHsA5CVBljqE3lJnzMUgA8iuER5hEt157brg9jSH/vDgI0blAFq37
 /zwy4EaBTrTGVoi6I96Ln8UJLF9ViioaHrWta/Nxs9szETHC165aeyRhmD5RTa9WPWfd
 kIt3/d2S8AeTgm5pvAUoWsNfvVOq0chd0tlmFn+UbcIn6+bQaPcjkMMWnFbTbgr9/CRf
 ZRiKMrXtJ/0UEFJ6oIOCSaEYcFY1sKR/ZaVS4TUzbdaJOuFZWPtK3x/ad45JkQyg70zI
 47Mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.139.66 with SMTP id qw2mr10492330oeb.11.1417504773196;
 Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.6.21 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.6.21 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:19:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <f9944f6964424fcde819ca06d210e23a@mkproductions.org>
References: <f9944f6964424fcde819ca06d210e23a@mkproductions.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 23:19:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOjFWZ5rcogRuCUNZQ_tb3zRDNTt2_6Sh2HYg6-YMpXa+m2ALA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS available space difference between 10.0 and 10.1
From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To: Mark Kane <mark@kane.mn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 07:19:34 -0000

On Dec 1, 2014 10:19 PM, "Mark Kane" <mark@kane.mn> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I updated a machine running 10.0-STABLE from April to 10.1-RELEASE and am
noticing a discrepancy in available space on a ZFS filesystem between
versions.

[snip]

> Has anyone seen any similar issues in 10.1, or any ideas what could cause
the discrepancy between versions? I'm happy to provide any further
info/testing if needed.

IIUC, ZFS now reserves 3% of pool space for administrative purposes (namely
to be able to delete things when "pool is full").

So a pool imported on 10.0 will show more available space than a pool
imported on 10.1.

Cheers,
Freddie