From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 16 23:11:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA23126 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 23:11:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from yoss.canweb.net (root@yoss.canweb.net [207.139.235.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA23116 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 23:11:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yossman@yoss.canweb.net) Received: from localhost (yossman@localhost) by yoss.canweb.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA20860; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:06:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:06:31 -0400 (EDT) From: yossman To: dkelly@hiwaay.net cc: chad@dcfinc.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anti-spam sendmail in 2.2.5? In-Reply-To: <199710162355.SAA21850@nospam.hiwaay.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 16 Oct 1997 dkelly@hiwaay.net wrote: > I don't support legislation making it illegal to forge mail. I'd rather see > RFC's alter the protocol into something that is extremely difficult to > forge. Idiot lawmakers have already proven they Don't Have A Clue. bravo. that is exactly what would have come out of my mouth, had i said it first. i was just discussing with some colleagues this very fact of supporting new laws, instead of making better protocols. if we want and expect the Net to self-regulate, let's start with the procotols it's built on, right? yossman ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Yossarian Holmberg (yossman) yossman@yossman.org System Administrator, National Online http://www.yossman.org/ my statements are my own, not my employer's -- i do not speak for them. '... and if i die, before i learn to speak .. can money pay for all the days i've lived awake but half asleep?' -- Primitive Radio Gods, "Standing Outside a Broken Phone Booth With Money In My Hand"