From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 30 10:51:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17FC16A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (fast.dnswatch.com [216.177.243.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8408E43D31 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (localhost.dnswatch.com [127.0.0.1]) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j3UAourt023468 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:51:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id j3UAotto023467; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:50:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fast.dnswatch.com: www set sender to null@dnswatch.com using -f Received: from ns0.1command.com ([216.177.243.38]) (DNSwatch.com_WebMail authenticated user null) by webmail.dnswatch.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3148.216.177.243.38.1114858254.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:50:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "/dev/null" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org User-Agent: DNSwatch.com_WebMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:51:13 -0000 Hello All, Greatly appreciate all the input you've provided. Since the majority of feedback was of a negative nature. I've decided to *definitive* pursue this project - just to spite you. ;) Seriously, I can see where there is a place for this and I think I have enough feedback to know the approach. But upon reflecting on all the input I've received on all this and so many other things. It occurs to me that I can/ should kill a couple of "peevs" I've had w/ the current system and in doing so make alot of others happy as well. So in short, while I'd really like to put the pretty sticker on the box. I think I'd be better of in the long run if I re-paint the box first. Make any sense? So, if you're remotely curious about any of this, have a look @ "cleanup-boot.messages+overhaul-install". Thanks for all your input - both positive and negative. -Chris H. //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////