From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 3 22:21:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from blockhead.mincom.com (blockhead1.mincom.com [203.55.175.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2D71539B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 22:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from philh@mincom.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by blockhead.mincom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA72534 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:21:17 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from philh@mincom.com) Received: from porthole.mincom.oz.au(172.17.100.2) via SMTP by blockhead.mincom.oz.au, id smtpdp72528; Mon Oct 4 15:21:17 1999 Received: (from philh@localhost) by porthole.mincom.oz.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) id PAA24725 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:21:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:21:16 +1000 From: Phil Homewood To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: squid, ssl, socks5 and -STABLE Message-ID: <19991004152116.R24094@mincom.com> References: <19991002075858.B32723@mincom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <19991002075858.B32723@mincom.com>; from Phil Homewood on Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 07:58:58AM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Phil Homewood wrote: > I seem to have found a problem with squid 2.2-STABLE4 running > under FreeBSD-3.3-STABLE (cvsupped within the last 36 hours). Some more news to hand: > The squid host sits behind a firewall (also 3.3-STABLE, last > cvsupped a couple of weeks ago.) running SOCKS5. I also have > a second firewall, same config but still running a 3.2-STABLE; > makes no difference which firewall I use. squid and SOCKS5 on the squid host are both as installed by the ports collection. SOCKS5 is 1.0r10. Forgot to mention this earlier, my apologies. > Have I found a buglet in squid, in FreeBSD's socket code, or > am I just doing something terminally stupid? > > (This basic concept has been working fine with squid 1.1.x on > Digital Unix, so I see no theoretical reason why I can't do > what I want to here...) 2.2-STABLE4 tests fine on DU 4.0D with socks5 1.0r10 and the same squid.conf and libsocks5.conf, so it doesn't seem to be a squid buglet. Unless squid is doing something brain-damaged that DU doesn't care about, of course. I'm completely out of ideas, now. Anyone? -- Phil Homewood DNRC email: philh@mincom.com Postmaster and BOFH Mincom Pty Ltd phone: +61-7-3303-3524 Brisbane, QLD Australia fax: +61-7-3303-3269 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message