From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 3 5:30:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BF237B41C; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 05:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2CC8A14C53; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:30:55 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: re@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? References: <20011231174113.O16101@elvis.mu.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 03 Jan 2002 14:30:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20011231174113.O16101@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alfred Perlstein writes: > What is the proceedure one must follow to present xfree4 as the new > default? It's been around for a long time and support a LOT more > chipsets a lot better. Can we go ahead and just pull some switch > or are there more sinister issues involved? A lot of ports (particularly those that depend on Mesa) don't work with XFree86 4. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message