From owner-freebsd-fs Mon Aug 23 23:30:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net (gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net [207.246.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9AE158F0; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:29:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ross@gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net) Received: (from ross@localhost) by gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA04749; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908240628.XAA04749@gilliam.users.flyingcroc.net> From: Bill Studenmund Reply-To: Bill Studenmund To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Terry Lambert , Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Yes, but we need subsecond in the filesystems. Think about make(1) on > a blinding fast machine... Oh yes, I realize that. :-) It's just that I thought you were at one point suggesting having 128 bits to the left of the decimal point (128 bits worth of seconds). I was trying to say that'd be a bit much. :-) Take care, Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message