From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Jun 10 23:39:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA04389 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 23:39:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (castles69.castles.com [208.214.165.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA04384 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 23:39:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@antipodes.cdrom.com) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antipodes.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01089; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806110529.WAA01089@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: shmit@kublai.com cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "Andrew J. Doane" , Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 440BX based SMP systems In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 02:12:29 EDT." <19980610021229.57129@kublai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:29:09 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > What ever happened to timing Linux kernel builds under FreeBSD? I > still have a couple of clueless 31337 Linux weens here at work and > I'd love to be able to tell them to use FreeBSD to compile their > kernels. :-) Nobody supplied a ready-to-build Linux kernel tree for evaluation... -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message