From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 25 21:25:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA03616 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:25:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03600; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:25:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA11171; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:24:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:24:54 -0500 (EST) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Satoshi Asami , rcramer@sytex.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is the Final EOL Disposition of v2.2.8? In-Reply-To: <3419.917248557@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's a great idea, and a great release to hand to people that want to try it out but can't be bothered with an explanation of 'what all these damn releases are'. It is mighty stable (doh!) and still what I give to people who want to give it a spin. And I'm not quite ready to upgrade 20 machines yet, I've been putting off doing my workstation... Thanks, Charles On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > That sounds like a good idea. We may also want to make a 2.2S CDROM > which contains the very last of everything done on the 2.2 branch. > >From what I've heard so far, there would be demand for something > containing the very last packages/XFree86/2.2 snap/... for the branch > and if we needed to go to 6 CDs on it, we could even do that if that > meant making the last CD distro a truly comprehensive "cap" to the 2.2 > branch. What do people think? > > - Jordan > > > * > I would think that anything that was operational on v2.2.8, including pa > ckages > > * > and ports, up until the cut over to v3.0-STABLE, would be frozen at that > point > > * > and kept at that state (read down loadable by whatever flavor you prefer > ) > > * > for the foreseeable future. Is that our plan? > > * > > * That is. > > > > Actually I haven't planned to keeping the ports tree around. Should I > > tar up the one I used to build the final packages-2.2 and put it up on > > wcarchive? > > > > Satoshi > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message