From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 27 19:30:52 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0B437B402
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:30:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from caddis.yogotech.com (caddis.yogotech.com [206.127.123.130])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA24740;
	Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:30:46 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate@yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by caddis.yogotech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0S3Uh360019;
	Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:30:43 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate)
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15444.50658.246125.49778@caddis.yogotech.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:30:42 -0700
To: kudzu@tenebras.com
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness
In-Reply-To: <3C54C569.7952CBE0@tenebras.com>
References: <000c01c1a5ff$a4539870$0101a8c0@cascade>
	<20020125165307.C54729-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net>
	<20020125203328.A454@yip.org>
	<15443.41177.259786.242696@caddis.yogotech.com>
	<3C53A5A2.A5F8FBD6@tenebras.com>
	<15443.42601.781625.356369@caddis.yogotech.com>
	<3C543976.147A50E2@tenebras.com>
	<15444.44954.347602.724162@caddis.yogotech.com>
	<3C54C569.7952CBE0@tenebras.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > > > See above.  It can easily be done in a more standard way.  (One can
> > > > argue that the '-z' should be the default flag, but so far I've failed
> > > > to convince Warner of this fact. :) :)
> > >
> > > Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but the pccard_ether script (when last I
> > > looked at it) seems to assume exactly one network interface, and
> > > I was never able to get the "standard" way to work properly with
> > > two.
> > 
> > You don't have to use pccard_ifconfig.  You can use the normal
> > ifconfig_ed0 and/or ifconfig_ep0 lines to configure the interfaces just
> > as easily.
> 
> Right, I discovered this after updating my pccard_ether...  With the -z
> flag the cards get configured in order -- that is, the card in slot0
> gets configured first, and everything seems to work right.  Thanks again.

Glad it helped!


Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message