From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 29 19:37:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3344B16A47E for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from secure.socket.ch (secure.socket.ch [212.103.70.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD24E13C44B for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.lists@fsck.ch) Received: from 80-219-148-21.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.219.148.21] helo=factory.fsck.ch) by secure.socket.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I4MHg-000Jwr-R3; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: <46855F7E.6040604@fsck.ch> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:37:34 +0200 From: Tobias Roth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070618) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <59854.62.2.233.2.1183114099.squirrel@secure.socket.ch> <468555F9.7020403@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <468555F9.7020403@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "secure.socket.ch", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Doug Barton wrote: > freebsd.lists@fsck.ch wrote: >> -- snip bind question -- >> >> And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? > > There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists, > whether they are directly relevant to the list topic or not. If things > get too far off base, users are generally directed to a more > topic-specific list. I don't see any reason to alter that tradition. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.6 TVD_RCVD_IP TVD_RCVD_IP 0.0 DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys Identified Mail: policy says domain signs some mails X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.219.148.21 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: freebsd.lists@fsck.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on secure.socket.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Minseok Choi Subject: Re: BIND Configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:37:42 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > freebsd.lists@fsck.ch wrote: >> -- snip bind question -- >> >> And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE? > > There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists, > whether they are directly relevant to the list topic or not. If things > get too far off base, users are generally directed to a more > topic-specific list. I don't see any reason to alter that tradition. All right, I'll respect that and will refrain from sending similar messages in the future. My apologies to Minseok. For the record, I was sending a polite message explaining my point, which the above short quote fails to reflect. I just don't want people that didn't read my previous message to think I am a rude grumbler :-) Thanks, Tobias