From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 17 11:31:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D6A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 11:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CA943D54
	for <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 17 May 2004 11:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
        by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
        Mon, 17 May 2004 11:31:19 -0700
Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id DADDB5D0C;
	Mon, 17 May 2004 11:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 May 2004 11:12:53 PDT."
             <20040517111058.D20078@root.org> 
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:31:18 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20040517183118.DADDB5D0C@ptavv.es.net>
cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ACPI interrupt storms during shutdown 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 18:31:21 -0000

> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
>
> Yep, I've got that too.  What happens is a series of GPEs occur during the
> AcpiTerminate() process.  I'll be changing the ACPI shutdown process after
> I do some more debugging of the source of the GPEs.  The interrupt storm
> check is probably too sensitive in some non-runtime cases.
> 
> This is on the ACPI TODO list:
> http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/acpi-todo.html

No problem. I just wanted to make sure that the problem was noted,
especially if it had implications at times other than shutdown that
might not have been visible.

Thanks!
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634