From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 16 19:00:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B191065676 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD618FC15 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17434 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 19:00:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Oct 2009 19:00:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CAB525087A; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:00:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: ports@freebsd.org References: <44d44n8c27.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:00:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44d44n8c27.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:48:32 -0400") Message-ID: <444opz88q8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: Firefox FORBIDDEN for a while now.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:00:33 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Chris Rees writes: > >> Since firefox 2.* has so many vulnerabilities, isn't it about time to >> upgrade completely to firefox 3? The software's been out for over a >> year now (AFAICR), so why are we so reluctant to change it? > > Gecko support. We have most of the infrastructure to switch to > something else (I think xulrunner is the preferred provider), but > apparently not yet all. As Rainer Hurling just reminded me in another thread, it's libxul, not xulrunner, and it *is* already the default gecko provider, as noted in UPDATING. So at least in theory, the switch has already been made.