From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Oct 19 02:10:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA06888 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA06881; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Message-Id: <199610190910.CAA06881@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org, obrien@NUXI.cs.ucdavis.edu Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA06206 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id CAA10667; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610190903.CAA10667@relay.nuxi.com> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 02:03:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "David E. O'Brien" Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.cs.ucdavis.edu To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: obrien@Nuxi.com X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 Subject: docs/1841: NT boot mgr too Linux centric in FAQ Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 1841 >Category: docs >Synopsis: NT boot mgr too Linux centric in FAQ >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Oct 19 02:10:01 PDT 1996 >Last-Modified: >Originator: David E. O'Brien >Organization: University of California, Davis >Release: FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386 >Environment: current FAQ >Description: I know I'm being very nit-picking, but here is my change request: The answer in the FAQ to "How can I use the NT loader to boot FreeBSD?" is a little too Linux centric for my tastes. I like having answers for both FreeBSD and Linux (as many people may be running both). However, can the FreeBSD parts be moved to *before* the Linux ones? It makes FreeBSD look a little bit like it is playing second fiddle to Linux. >How-To-Repeat: n/a >Fix: vi FAQ.sgml :-) >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: