From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 6 06:48:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA21631 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netcom10.netcom.com (stanb@netcom10.netcom.com [192.100.81.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA21626 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from stanb@localhost) by netcom10.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom) id JAA15541; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:48:05 -0400 From: stanb@netcom.com (Stan Brown) Message-Id: <199704061348.JAA15541@netcom10.netcom.com> Subject: cvsup from machine using FreebSD net coonect with ppp aliasing ? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.com (Free BSD Questions list) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 09:48:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am trying to get a cvsup sesion started from my 2nd FreeBSD machine. I am using the same setup file that I used yesterday from the other machine. It is timing out trying to open a connection with the server. The only significant difference that comes to mind is the first machine dials up my IPS directly. I then use ppp alliasing to allow the othe machines on my network access to the internet this way. Thus the 2nd machine is being alliasedvia the frst. I have never had a problem with other protocols doing this, is ther any reason the cvsup's protocol should be different? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 404-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- Look, look, see Windows 95. Buy, lemmings, buy! Pay no attention to that cliff ahead... Henry Spencer (c) 1997 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.