From owner-cvs-all Sun Feb 22 08:57:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA10897 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:57:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA10888 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:57:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA27098; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:56:28 -0800 (PST) To: Ollivier Robert cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Feb 1998 12:33:48 +0100." <19980222123348.16912@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 08:56:27 -0800 Message-ID: <27094.888166587@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Wait, I thought IANA policy was to allocate both protocols at the same time > to avoid having one service on udp and another on tcp on the same > port... Why can't we keep on this way ? Gah! One set of people tell me "it doesn't use UDP, take it out!" and another group says "keep it in!" and I say "Why the $@#%&^! is it that the really small insignificant changes generate the most bloody traffic?" Case in point: I'm still waiting for *anyone* save Mike Smith (who just confirmed it for me last night) to respond to my "VFAT/FAT32 support is in -current now, can someone test it?" and yet I've gotten about 6 messages about 4 stupid lines in /etc/services. Am I the only one here who thinks that people have their priorities rather severely skewed? :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message