Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:45:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kevent()/kqueue() in a multithreaded environment Message-ID: <200007281945.MAA26198@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007271246160.56534-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> from Doug White at "Jul 27, 2000 02:08:43 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug White writes: > You normally wouldn't mix kqueue and threads; you'd use kqueue to > *implement* threads. :-) > > AFAIK kqueue hasn't been made threadsafe, you'll have to bug > jlemon@freebsd.org about it. Patches gladly accepted :) I may be just being stupid but I don't understand that last sentence. I thought kqueue() and kevent() were system calls... how can they not be thread safe? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007281945.MAA26198>