From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Aug 29 22: 4:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from postal.linkfast.net (postal.linkfast.net [208.160.105.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C337B42C for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 22:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by postal.linkfast.net (Postfix, from userid 103) id 0E3C09B35; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:04:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:04:15 -0500 From: GH To: Terry Lambert Cc: j mckitrick , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OSS, Sun, GPL, random ramblings Message-ID: <20000830000414.A56358@linkfast.net> References: <20000821140419.B13975@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200008242057.NAA15423@usr06.primenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200008242057.NAA15423@usr06.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 08:57:23PM +0000 X-OS: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org *snip snippity snip snip* > Crossing that barrier, we have documentation. One of the most > intriguing, yet piss-poorly documented OSS projects is ZOPE. I > would really have liked to use it for a project, but of course > I had to go with PHP instead; much less interesting, much higher > overhead (it's going to cost me ~$36,000 in extra hardware), but Why would PHP rather than ZOPE cost ~$36,000 in *extra* hardware? That sounds like a lot of equipment even just for performance(?), storage(?) differences... gh > rather well documented (so it's possible for people to document > their code well -- just don't expect it from any but the HTML > geeks, who mostly write text or a close relative for their living. > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message