From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 22 18:02:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA47BE5E73 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A20975C; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bn8KM-000581-NN; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:02:30 +0300 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:02:30 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Steven Hartland Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , Kubilay Kocak , Ryan Stone , Karl Pielorz , freebsd-net Subject: Re: lagg Interfaces - don't do Gratuitous ARP? Message-ID: <20160922180230.GD2840@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20160921235703.GG1018@cell.glebi.us> <20160922025856.GH1018@cell.glebi.us> <348d534d-ef87-f90c-aa43-cc65c2f6283c@multiplay.co.uk> <20160922150940.GK1018@cell.glebi.us> <20160922154144.GO1018@cell.glebi.us> <0c678da4-bf72-5a81-aee1-d82a873661b7@multiplay.co.uk> <20160922160840.GP1018@cell.glebi.us> <80fd962a-fba3-d71e-a1cb-2b09181d3925@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80fd962a-fba3-d71e-a1cb-2b09181d3925@multiplay.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:02:34 -0000 On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:50:09PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > Having tested with a number of vendor switches Cisco, Extreme and more > recently Arista only sending gratuitous ARP for IPv4 and unsolicited NA > for IPv6 reliably resulted in rapid failover between LAGG ports. > > Other methods like sending correctly addressed output from the new port > helped, we tested this with outbound pings from IPMI, but still resulted > in noticeable recovery delay. Can you give network diagram and switchs configs for this? Recovery delay on lagg interface and lacp protocol must be about 2s by default configuration.