From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 17:40:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B8D16A496 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84CC13C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079D22088; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:40:05 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C092087; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:40:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C0ABB844AF; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:40:04 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20080118.145436.-1540399028.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080124114039.GF79134@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <479880A7.1030107@digiware.nl> <20080124.084828.1608359032.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:40:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080124.084828.1608359032.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Thu\, 24 Jan 2008 08\:48\:28 -0700 \(MST\)") Message-ID: <864pd386mj.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sshd broken on arm? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:40:14 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > Actually, the above fix *IS* the correct fix for arm given the ABI > that we're using... No. The correct fix is one that will be acceptable to the upstream vendor, who has a different perspective on things than we do. And guys, please learn to trim your quotes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no