From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Feb 13 6:46:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DB337B405; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:46:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident) by omega.lovett.com with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16b0gK-000BFB-00; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:46:48 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:47:35 -0600 Subject: Re: An interesting issue with bsd.gnome.mk From: Ade Lovett To: Maxim Sobolev , Jeremy Lea Cc: , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3C6A7970.BA6ABF07@FreeBSD.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 02/13/02 08:34, "Maxim Sobolev" wrote: > Jeremy Lea wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 08:48:33PM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote: >>> It doesn't. >> >> Try this... > > Attached patch should fix xscreensaver+GNOME properly. Doug, please > give your blessing. > > There is another problem - namely the fact that gnomecc installs its > own version of the screensaver capplet replacing gomecc's one. My > proposition is to disable gnomecc's version of the capplet, because it > is null and void without xscreensaver port installed anyway. I have patches to remove the controlcenter capplet, I'm just toying with the idea of whether I should make x11/xscreensaver a direct dependency of x11/gnomecore, so that the end-user does have a usable screensaver capability with just installing the basic core GNOME components. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message