From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 17:48:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8940C1065670; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9A38FC13; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 148D846B0A; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D7A08A02E; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:48:19 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:48:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20110719112033.GA51765@omma.gibson.athome> <201107201928.54079.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20110721022818.GA17771@omma.gibson.athome> In-Reply-To: <20110721022818.GA17771@omma.gibson.athome> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107211348.18954.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:48:19 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Callum Gibson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: powernow regression in 8-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:48:20 -0000 On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:28:19 pm Callum Gibson wrote: > On 20Jul11 19:28, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > }From your dmesg output, I see that the processor speed was not > }calibrated properly. ML-40's max. core freq. is 2,200 MHz according > }to its specification but it was probed at 2,282 MHz, which is too > }high. I think that's the problem. Can you please try the attached > }patch? > > Yes, I have seen core freq wobble around for most of the time I've owned it, > but usually close to 2200. Possibly try disabling legacy USB in your BIOS as a test? -- John Baldwin