From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jul 13 10:49:01 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA18984
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 10:49:01 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA18978
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 10:48:59 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA24095; Thu, 13 Jul 95 11:41:37 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9507131741.AA24095@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0.5 Software compatibilities
To: didier@omnix.fr.org (Didier Derny)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 95 11:41:37 MDT
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199507131333.PAA00244@zapata.omnix.fr.org> from "Didier Derny" at Jul 13, 95 03:33:16 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hi
> 
> are these softwares working with FreeBSD 2.0.5

Some of these are functionality issues, not software packages, but:

> -   PCNFSD  				YES
> -   NFS locks				NO  (this is a functionality issue)
> -   CERN HTTP				YES
> -   Netscape 1.1N			YES
> -   Mosaic 				YES
> -   Phoenix				?   (Never heard of it)
> -   Gnu Emacs				YES
> -   xemacs  (Lucid Emacs)		YES
> -   elm with mime			YES
> -   any X11 mailer			YES (xmail)
> -   sendmail				YES
> -   Tailor uucp			YES
> -   INN				YES
> -   majordomo				YES (you're soaking in it now)
> -   ftpmail				YES
> -   Tex 				YES
> -   Latex				YES
> -   ghostscript			YES
> -   tin				YES
> -   groff				YES
> -   bootp				YES
> -   snmp				YES
> -   lynx				YES
> -   gnu ada				YES
> -   rzsz				YES
> -   seyon				YES
> -   kermit				YES
> -   ksh				YES
> -   pine				YES
> -   popper				YES
> -   motif  (mwm + dev library)	YES (commercial software)


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.