From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 5 09:20:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E8C16A4CE; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:20:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BBB43D49; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id A699F5319; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:20:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 37ED15309; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 1BC8FB860; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:19:55 +0200 (CEST) To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman References: <200407041559.i64FxPpj048980@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040704160339.GA997@green.homeunix.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 11:19:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040704160339.GA997@green.homeunix.org> (Brian Fundakowski Feldman's message of "Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:03:39 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_core.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:20:04 -0000 Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: > Any subsequent desire to change the semantics of malloc(9) or > uma_zalloc(9) in the M_WAITOK case, such as this, absolutely must be > taken up with the Security Officer. There is no mention anywhere in the SO charter about the SO being responsible for your lack of maturity. If you have a technical argument to make, we have technical mailing lists for precisely that purpose. Otherwise, please allow Bosko to do what he thinks best. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no