From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 8 07:32:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40096106564A for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.vx.sk (core.vx.sk [188.40.32.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E868FC17 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from core.vx.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36509F301C; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:32:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.vx.sk Received: from mail.vx.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by core.vx.sk (mail.vx.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id InUI3tYLEXkn; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.9.8.1] (188-167-78-139.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.78.139]) by mail.vx.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33BA3F3010; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C357F0A.70009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:32:26 +0200 From: Martin Matuska User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sk; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." References: <4C31C71C.2010606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Jason J. W. Williams" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:32:30 -0000 User and group quotas is no important enhancement? We have to see the whole thing from a stability perspective as well - OpenSolaris has by far less testing than Solaris 10. Oracle cannot afford to feed his enterprise customers (and these are not few) with untested code. Dňa 7. 7. 2010 20:30, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote / napísal(a): > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jason J. W. Williams > wrote: > >> If the target is FreeBSD 9 instead of 8.1, why not merge ZFS v19? 15 >> really doesn't give any major enhancements over 14 and FreeBSD 9 isn't >> coming out any time. >> >> 19 would give much need log device removal and triple parity RAID-Z. >> Both of which are well tested at this point via OpenSolaris. >> >> > these are very valid points, but I am not sure that anyone has zfs v19 patches > >