From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 20:33:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367C7478 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1602864DF5 for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.200.212] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B33DB192A3B for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54A700AF.2070500@ignoranthack.me> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:33:51 -0800 From: Sean Bruno Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARM build machine question References: <1420201286256-5977676.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1420201286256-5977676.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 20:33:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/02/15 04:21, Scott Ellis wrote: > I'm setting up a new amd64 machine that I'll be using for one > purpose only, building ARM images based on CURRENT. > > What's the recommendation, should I be running 10.1 or CURRENT on > the build machine? > > No display on the build machine. SSH access only. > > I know probably either works, but just wondering if there was a > preference from some more experienced developers out there. > > > Since you specified -current, I'd probably install the machine with - -current. sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUpwCrXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kv4sH/1CWPIUVbaG7+S31dUfGY7rV p/jBmMtYrVF0fweDCnaLkNJYRQKchok3jB1l/13Q2lsNwZlMyqjlXZbxWnEjOPVH 8wkbIOKcqHzjN3u/ycVseJfHCIX8bxsSUmBArA+WB3sykvOvCsSwnD/W8sDoeBKj LkQ/sEgkoTRhUmZ9rvWjxlL2Gsst4Nz9VYXhrHCnrcsGdZ4BZdNB7YyxR3pJ81pY rw/tRRny8rkOgqTLpySAETsxq+j3iCDEShMtrC3KsgT5OdJ19tM1zaGSWTxAy0f3 ahTEA5+MgUjByIhKhHzqfKmIVy3SBW5EKYI9Jz6DkQVG4e71jM3f8nD6cXKK5sw= =9Ttv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----