Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:25:11 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for NEW_PCIB to ia64 Message-ID: <201107180925.11793.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4536024D-2197-4248-B493-43A0BB247572@xcllnt.net> References: <201107151619.11972.jhb@freebsd.org> <201107161251.33808.jhb@freebsd.org> <4536024D-2197-4248-B493-43A0BB247572@xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, July 16, 2011 7:22:24 pm Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2011, at 9:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011 11:42:55 am Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> On Jul 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> Since ia64 uses ACPI, I believe that all it needs is a > >>> bus_adjust_resource() method in its nexus driver to support the new > >>> PCI-PCI bridge driver (and the other patches I posted to current@ > >>> recently in regards to Host-PCI bridge driver decoding ranges). Can > >>> someone try this patch and boot with a kernel with 'options NEW_PCIB' to > >>> check for any regressions? > >> > >> Looks good. However, (see below) no devices are attached to the only > >> real PCI-PCI bridges in this system (the PCIe root ports). Let me know > >> if that's ok or whether it helps to use my machines so that I can plug > >> something in a slot (I don't have physical access to this one without > >> annoying Sean :-) > > > > Hmm, a thorough test requires a device behind a PCI-PCI bridge. :-/ > > As it happens, I don't have machines with real PCI-PCI bridges; only > PCI host controllers. Since nothing broke that I can test, I can not > see any regressions. > > Unless someone else can test real PCI-PCI bridges with an actual device > on the subordinate bus(ses), I think we can change ia64 to NEW_PCIB. Ok. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201107180925.11793.jhb>