From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 10 15:35:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6403237B503 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.9.2/8.8.7) with UUCP id XAA34975; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:35:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.2] (eccles [194.32.164.2]) by seagoon.gid.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA04578; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:08:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20001010200811.A8273@freebie.demon.nl> References: ; from rb@gid.co.uk on Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:35:57PM +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:08:47 +0100 To: Wilko Bulte From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: ed0: warning - receiver ring buffer overrun Cc: current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 20:08 +0200 10/10/00, Wilko Bulte wrote: >On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:35:57PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm seeing lots of: >> >> ed0: warning - receiver ring buffer overrun >> >> This box is building the world with sources via NFS. What gives? > >Something not servicing the ed0 card fast enough? That would be consistent with what I'm seeing. >FWIW: my -current build >on a PPro 200 took it's normal 3-something hours. NFS seems to be horrendously slow right now, my builds are taking 5 times as long as expected. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message