Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 08:55:33 +0100 From: Oliver Psotta <oliver.psotta@posteo.de> To: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Effect of partitioning on wear-leveling Message-ID: <AC03ED3F-D113-4640-9DFD-DCAC193A5517@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfp5jffpHcnoDJg24stUydEssASeC4owmz7n-fmY=evGzQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20160321175952.GA83908@www.zefox.net> <1458586884.68920.96.camel@freebsd.org> <20160321221153.GB83908@www.zefox.net> <1458600070.68920.107.camel@freebsd.org> <1973487B-0AA7-468D-A9CC-319FBE2122F0@netgate.com> <CANCZdfrCWXAswe02Qd3tTiDL8O_4TGEWbhFqgft4Q9aKj7ixvg@mail.gmail.com> <20160322033417.GD83908@www.zefox.net> <201603230349.VAA20311@mail.lariat.net> <CANCZdfp5jffpHcnoDJg24stUydEssASeC4owmz7n-fmY=evGzQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Which SSDs failed on you, Warner? There sure are some rotten apples, but the Samsung 840 pro, for example, were (are) quite reliable. -Oliver > On 23 Mar 2016, at 07:45, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > Hope your SSDs are better at reporting things than ours. We've seen some > SSDs > just fail even though the previous SMART data said we've used maybe 20% of > the > drive's write ability....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AC03ED3F-D113-4640-9DFD-DCAC193A5517>