From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 25 08:41:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55DB16A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:41:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgap-gw.mipt.ru (dgap-gw.mipt.ru [194.85.81.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8DA43D58
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:41:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nepal@nas.dgap.mipt.ru)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by dgap-gw.mipt.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C900E600042A;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:41:28 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from dgap-gw.mipt.ru ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (dgap-gw.mipt.ru [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 09834-02; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:41:20 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from nas.dgap.mipt.ru (nas.dgap.mipt.ru [194.85.81.203])
	by dgap-gw.mipt.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71386623CF6B;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:41:14 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from nas.dgap.mipt.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nas.dgap.mipt.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0P8iwW6009171;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:44:58 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from nepal@nas.dgap.mipt.ru)
Received: (from nepal@localhost)
	by nas.dgap.mipt.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id j0P8ivdT009170;
	Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:44:57 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from nepal)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:44:57 +0300
From: "Andrew L. Neporada" <andr@dgap.mipt.ru>
To: Warner Losh <imp@rover.village.org>
Message-ID: <20050125084457.GA9093@nas.dgap.mipt.ru>
References: <20050123203516.GT628@cicely12.cicely.de>
	<20050124170008.GA6817@nas.dgap.mipt.ru>
	<20050124170643.GG628@cicely12.cicely.de>
	<20050124.102203.74714423.imp@harmony.village.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050124.102203.74714423.imp@harmony.village.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p8 (Gentoo) at dgap.mipt.ru
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=7.5 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: ticso@cicely.de
Subject: Re: "configured irq .. is not in bitmap of probed irqs 0" -- what
	does it mean?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:41:33 -0000

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:22:03AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > sio2 irq10                 981321        757
> > > sio3 irq11                 981382        757
> > > Total                     2316081       1788
> > 
> > Looks like everything is fine and the message is just false alarm.
> 
> It might be a false alarm.  The interrupt rate is kinda high,
> indicating that you are running full speed without pause the entire
> time the system has been up.  It is interesting to note that both
> serial ports have very similar numbers, which seems improbable over
> such a long period of time.

I think this is because both ports have transferred the same amount of 
data (~10Mb) during testing. ;-)

>
> These are the symptoms that I've observed
> in interrupt storms in the past.
> 
> Warner

					Andrew.