From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Fri Nov 13 06:47:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1417BA2EAA1; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CE61ABC; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D6B2263; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09C3D3FB8D; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:47:24 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: Dewayne Geraghty , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111184448.GR31314@zxy.spb.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:47:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:28:41 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <86egfu9z0j.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:47:45 -0000 Benjamin Kaduk writes: > Things seem to have slowed down a lot since the lead Heimdal developer > got hired for Apple. [...] MIT employs developers whose job > descriptions include being the krb5 release manager [...] Heimdal has > changed plans to a 1.7 release [...] and since the developers in > question are being paid to work on other things, there is no real > timeline for the release. Given this state of affairs, it might not be unreasonable to consider switching back for 11. There should be enough time, provided our Kerberos maintainers have some spare cycles. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no