From owner-freebsd-small Wed Apr 19 18:15: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from lepton.subatomix.com (okc-224-168.mmcable.com [24.94.224.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285E537B658 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:15:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jss@lepton.subatomix.com) Received: from localhost (jss@localhost) by lepton.subatomix.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA25758; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:18:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jss@lepton.subatomix.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:18:07 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jeffrey S. Sharp" To: Albert Yang Cc: papowell@astart.com, freebsd-small Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] reviewers needed for repairs to PicoBSD - In-Reply-To: <38FE54A6.A0111ACE@achtung.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Albert Yang wrote: > So will yours be called then "microBSD" or "nanoBSD"? I think that > sounds cooler than TinyBSD IMHO. I had trouble figuring out what to call it, since the design supports sizes from deciBSD to femptoBSD :). I thought that TinyBSD would be general enough. Any suggestions (still micro- or nano-)? =============================== Jeffrey S. Sharp (XorAxAx) jss@subatomix.com -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.12 GCS/IT/MU d-@ s-:+ a21 C++(++++) UBL+(+++$)> P L+(+++$)> E+> W++ N+(++) o? K? w++$> !O M(-) !V PS+ PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+ R(+) tv+ b+ DI++(+++) G++ e> h--- r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message