From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 11:17:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45A737B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D3C43F75
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5IIHTXh016939;
	Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EF09656.CF1614A5@mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306181413010.16088-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: threads@freebsd.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Removal of bogus gethostbyaddr_r()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:17:31 -0000

On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:

> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > Any objections?
> > 
> > Why is this bogus?  Do we have another gethostbyaddr_r hiding
> > somewhere?
> 
> It lies?  (_r).

If that's true, then it's a bug and eventually should
be fixed.  Additionally, you can't go around removing
public interfaces without bumping library versions
(unless said interface hasn't seen a release yet).

-- 
Dan Eischen