From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 7 23:45: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759F1155A6; Fri, 7 May 1999 23:44:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id PAA11267; Sat, 8 May 1999 15:44:52 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3733DCDA.6A72EC54@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 15:42:34 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: eivind@freebsd.org, "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Possible upgrade problem? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After a recent report on a difference between 2.2.x and 3.1 GENERIC kernel, I confirmed that the following change never went into 2.2.x-stable. Furthermore, the upgrade target *does not* deal with it. Further furthermore, nor does UPDATING mention it (it's newer than the change). It seems kernels without this can boot, but are unstable. Comments? Work-arounds? Is a comment in Errata in order? src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC: 1.105 Sat Jan 24 2:54:09 1998 UTC by eivind Diffs to 1.104 Make all file-system (MFS, FFS, NFS, LFS, DEVFS) related option new-style. This introduce an xxxFS_BOOT for each of the rootable filesystems. (Presently not required, but encouraged to allow a smooth move of option *FS to opt_dontuse.h later.) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness if that _none_ of his predictions have come true yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message