Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 15:42:34 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: eivind@freebsd.org, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Subject: Possible upgrade problem? Message-ID: <3733DCDA.6A72EC54@newsguy.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
After a recent report on a difference between 2.2.x and 3.1 GENERIC kernel, I confirmed that the following change never went into 2.2.x-stable. Furthermore, the upgrade target *does not* deal with it. Further furthermore, nor does UPDATING mention it (it's newer than the change). It seems kernels without this can boot, but are unstable. Comments? Work-arounds? Is a comment in Errata in order? src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC: 1.105 Sat Jan 24 2:54:09 1998 UTC by eivind Diffs to 1.104 Make all file-system (MFS, FFS, NFS, LFS, DEVFS) related option new-style. This introduce an xxxFS_BOOT for each of the rootable filesystems. (Presently not required, but encouraged to allow a smooth move of option *FS to opt_dontuse.h later.) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness if that _none_ of his predictions have come true yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3733DCDA.6A72EC54>