From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 26 10:02:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04325 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:02:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04316 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA20469; Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:01:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199808261701.KAA20469@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Olivier Galibert cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help, Linux beats freebsd to death (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Aug 1998 18:51:55 +0200." <19980826185155.A20421@loria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 10:01:12 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 08:22:08AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Anyone got good ideas? > > Asynchronous metadata writing ? > > Beware that linux 2.1 is even faster when it comes to the filesystem > because of the dcache architecture. > > OG. and how does it compare to soft updates which I think is bloody fast. Cheers, Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message