From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:42:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC5C16A4D0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC5C43DA6; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:41:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0BNf0ET044005; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:41:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20040111.164056.56440437.imp@bsdimp.com> To: lorenzo@vicisano.net From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040111152040.A16863@cisco.com> References: <20040111011553.A12385@cisco.com> <20040111.142357.50578253.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040111152040.A16863@cisco.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: prism 2.5 timeout in wi_cmd 0x010b X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:42:03 -0000 In message: <20040111152040.A16863@cisco.com> Lorenzo Vicisano writes: : Warner, : : On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:23:57PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20040111011553.A12385@cisco.com> : > Lorenzo Vicisano writes: : > : However after upgrding the Prism firmware (1.1.0 -> 1.1.1) : > : the lock up stopped. : > : > You really really really want to be using 1.4.5 firmware. Older : > firmware is known to be buggy. : : I was referring to the "primary", as for the "station" : I went from 1.4.2 to 1.7.4 .. but does the "station" : firmware affect the functionality as a "client" anyways ? Yes. It does. I've had reports of problems with newer versions of the firmware... I've been too swamped to try it out. The newer versions implement AP to AP junk, as well as WPA enhancements... Warner