From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 4 10:16:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CA916A4B3 for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out010.verizon.net (out010pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9643A43FAF for ; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:16:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([68.237.14.199]) by out010.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20031004171619.MAPZ12520.out010.verizon.net@mac.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:16:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3F7F0062.5000206@mac.com> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 13:16:18 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roderick van Domburg References: <006b01c38a90$dea3b420$6ba55982@gog> In-Reply-To: <006b01c38a90$dea3b420$6ba55982@gog> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out010.verizon.net from [68.237.14.199] at Sat, 4 Oct 2003 12:16:19 -0500 cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When to use setup keyword? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 17:16:21 -0000 Roderick van Domburg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I was pondering if blindly trailing every tcp rule with the 'setup' keyword > would incur any performance loss or security hazard. It would incur a security hazard. Any tool which performs "stealth" scans (ie, such as nmap's default scan mode) would go right past your firewall rules. -- -Chuck