From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 25 11:32:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E9F15D for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A31385 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w59so8909802wes.24 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6T0FQBf0oyTtyNrgAJVWGunDbvH2eSnWjI+ZnQjKAkM=; b=EGP+ho/SN+AoAOCNj9hQeXJERn/l3ScX1/ALZJvk8HDuR848+KmnjO77FijbUtuKrt c5+XhkAZr6Gw2K6lZFmu8l7s1/ve8NWT1eJD9F6CcEPhZ7afrDQcOIDWDbY5rAQkQZUQ mFfphNz5AhgkY/By5+uaPUWVjZYHDMO0+zZwPOhL4UqoQn81BrTFzsVq8BslFnhgGiLM 7YdukbuM/ZD/hUT2OgxV4b9N34VAxvueOktJmwVLnSBhQ03bd+ymyO+23HK22qQBFl4V YVOtbxQwLSSmPEnERjFXw2C8sFEGEPDF9ZAF/BlIjuir9+/+7aFlcGdLAFTY5G7JGgeM EcwQ== X-Received: by 10.180.75.212 with SMTP id e20mr8866017wiw.30.1372159930353; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm3749190wiv.0.2013.06.25.04.32.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 04:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:32:07 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Ben Laurie Subject: Re: pkgng seems to be out of date? Message-ID: <20130625113206.GH75533@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130625103152.GF75533@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130625104028.GG75533@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rCwQ2Y43eQY6RBgR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:32:11 -0000 --rCwQ2Y43eQY6RBgR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > On 25 June 2013 11:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > >> On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: > >> >> ping? > >> >> > >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: > >> >> > $ pwd > >> >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc > >> >> > $ make build-depends-list > >> >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > >> >> > $ make run-depends-list > >> >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 > >> >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 > >> >> > > >> >> > But... > >> >> > > >> >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc > >> >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig > >> >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender > >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb > >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto > >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules > >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 > >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... > >> >> > > >> >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? > >> >> > > >> >> > And ... how do I fix it? > >> >> > > >> >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... > >> > > >> > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed u= ntil we can > >> > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install to= work > >> > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg = does not, > >> > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with pkg_inst= all and > >> > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install time,= it is very > >> > hard to remove this right now.) > >> > > >> > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) > >> > >> So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while ports= do not? > >> > > Yes > >> But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86.... > > > > That is probably a bug of run-depends not discovering you have tcl85 in= stalled > > so getting to the default tcl for its dependency which is tcl86. >=20 > I actually have both installed, so I think the bug is in pkg. I'd like > to remove ports I don't need but pkg won't let me remove tcl85, which > I think I don't really need... I think is it a bug in portmaster and/or not having fully follow 20130206 o= f UPDATING. pkg only registers dependencies it is being told to register by the ports tree/portmaster. >=20 > How can I force pkg to rebuild its dependencies? Is it even possible? portmaster -af should do it probably (I'm not a portmaster user) >=20 > Is there any way for pkg to check the integrity of its database? >=20 pkg check -d will do, but imho will find nothing. regards, Bapt --rCwQ2Y43eQY6RBgR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlHJf7YACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzSDQCeJv6PUe78a5+v61w587blsZV3 icYAnjTY82YBvTLcHA85ulPTUkRNK463 =sB96 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rCwQ2Y43eQY6RBgR--