From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 10:06:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF98F4FD for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FF02714 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA18470 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:06:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1V1vyA-00083i-V7 for freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:06:55 +0300 Message-ID: <51EFA71B.1070601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:06:19 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130708 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: mount(1) without /etc/fstab X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=X-VIET-VPS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:06:57 -0000 I found behavior of mount(1) rather annoying when there is no /etc/fstab. Some systems legitimately do not need (anything in) /etc/fstab, so all of that complaining is in vain. Should mount(1) be silenced in this case? Or should we have and install an empty etc/fstab just to please mount(1)? -- Andriy Gapon