From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Feb 18 15:49:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CA937BB0F; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:49:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zcollier@cncx.com) Received: from cliff.concentric.net (cliff.concentric.net [206.173.118.90]) by uhura.concentric.net (8.9.1a/(98/12/15 5.12)) id SAA23737; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:48:59 -0500 (EST) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Received: from cncx.com ([216.112.38.30]) by cliff.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id SAA16742; Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:46:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38ADD999.6A2CE1BD@cncx.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:45:29 -0800 From: Zander Collier X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sbwait state question References: <38ADD5A3.DF7EB7F5@cncx.com> <20000218160628.C21720@fw.wintelcom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, I was a little hesitant because I was afraid of being mocked for running an Ultima Online emulator. ;) It's called 'The Ultimate Server' or TUS. You can see it here: http://www.menasoft.com/tus/ and our implementation (if anyone is curious): http://chaosbound.cnchost.com/ Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Zander Collier [000218 16:00] wrote: > > I am running a server with a 3rd party server app that has upwards of > > 30 clients connecting to it at a time. It is supposed to accept up > > to 127 simultaneously. In the course of the day and in > > the use of the server, it is often falling into the state (as listed > > in top) of sbwait. This means that while it is in 'sbwait' mode > > the process is locked up and no one can do anything while connected to > > it. It will remain locked like this for upwards of 5 minutes and the > > shortest lockup was about 30 seconds. One time it was so long, I > > killed and restarted the process. > > > > I am running FreeBSD 3.4 and the Linux Compatibility libraries. > > Hmm, I rarely move something from -questions to another list, but this > seems interesting because I remeber some threads about how Linux does > socket stuff differently than FreeBSD, notably that certain file/socket > flags aren't passed to accept()'d connections. > > Does this ring a bell with anyone? > > If not the name of the actuall program and possibly an evaluation copy > for one of people working on emulation would be very helpful. > > -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message