From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 17 07:09:05 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA28178 for current-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:09:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA28171 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id HAA16817; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:08:56 -0800 (PST) To: Julian Elischer cc: barry@Lustig.COM, Charles Owens , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IP masquerading (for a LAN, _not_ PPP) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 16 Dec 1996 20:10:41 PST." <32B61D41.167EB0E7@whistle.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 07:08:56 -0800 Message-ID: <16813.850835336@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > > Take a look at IP Filter http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/. > > > > We really should bring this into -current at some point, now that > > we've branched. C'mon, there must be someone out there in -current > > land who's a) into networking, b) on the committers list and c) wants > > to see this go in. ;) > > welll there are some good things that ipfw does too.... Do you see me suggesting ipfilter as a replacement? :-) I just said we should bring it into -current; I would expect both to be provided as an option until such time as one totally subsumed the other, feature for feature, then we'd have just one. Jordan