From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jul 16 16:28:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA11585 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uruk.org (uruk.org [198.145.95.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA11572 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:28:28 -0700 (PDT) From: erich@uruk.org Received: from loopback (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by uruk.org (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA09014 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607162328.QAA09014@uruk.org> X-Authentication-Warning: uruk.org: Host loopback [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD-SMP fixes... Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:28:58 -0700 Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been re-writing the startup code for FreeBSD-SMP (the current code will only start some Pentium CPUs), and am partly sure what is causing some of the more nasty problems after the second processor gets activated. I just saw a message about Peter Wemm doing something like this already? Can we perhaps coordinate efforts? -- Erich Stefan Boleyn \_ E-mail (preferred): Mad Genius wanna-be, CyberMuffin \__ (finger me for other stats) Web: http://www.uruk.org/~erich/ Motto: "I'll live forever or die trying" This is my home system, so I'm speaking only for myself, not for Intel.