From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 21:52:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8376B1065680 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8798FC0A for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de ([217.29.45.10]) by gate1.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id q0HLqNia092576; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:52:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.46.8] ([217.29.46.8]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q0HLqMbi070814; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:52:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) References: <201201171859.10812.peter@hk.ipsec.se> In-Reply-To: <201201171859.10812.peter@hk.ipsec.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:52:23 +0100 To: peter h Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: about thumper aka sun fire x4500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:52:25 -0000 Hi, all, Am 17.01.2012 um 18:59 schrieb peter h : > I have been beating on of these a few days, i have udes freebsd 9.0 and 8.= 2 > Both fails when i engage > 10 disks, the system craches and messages : > "Hyper transport sync flood" will get into the BIOS errorlog ( but nothing= will > come to syslog since reboot is immediate) >=20 > Using a zfs radz of 25 disks and typing "zpool scrub" will bring the syste= m down in seconds. >=20 > Anyone using a x4500 that can comfirm that it works ? Or is this box broke= n ? Well, I hate to write that, but ... does it work with the vendor supported [= tm] OS? If yes, you can rule out a hardware defect. I would at least try Solaris for= this reason. If no, the HW is broken and there is no need to look for a fault on FreeBSD'= s side. Kind regards, Patrick=