From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 7 19:51:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA15320 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 19:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15288; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 19:50:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dns.pinpt.com (dns.pinpt.com [205.179.195.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id QAA01776 ; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 16:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover4 (gatemaster.pinpt.com [205.179.195.65]) by dns.pinpt.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA13960; Fri, 7 Mar 1997 16:11:31 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 97 16:12:34 Pacific Standard Time From: "Sean J. Schluntz" Subject: Re: Getting /usr/ports everywhere... To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Chameleon ATX 6.0, Standards Based IntraNet Solutions, NetManage Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <4821.857735697@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk --- On Fri, 07 Mar 1997 03:54:57 -0800 "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > I've been thinking about this for awhile, and I'm wondering whether or > not 2.2 might be a good time to unleash /usr/ports as a distribution > tarball as part of the release. I like the idea a lot! -Sean ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sean J. Schluntz Manager, Support Services ph. 408.997.6900 x222 PinPoint Software Corporation fx. 408.323.2300 6155 Almaden Expressway, Suite 100 San Jose, CA. 95120 http://www.pinpt.com/ Local Time Sent: 03/07/97 16:12:34 ----------------------------------------------------------------------