From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 18:01:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A42FD5 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www81.your-server.de (www81.your-server.de [213.133.104.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9ED38FB for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [92.76.80.218] (helo=michael-think) by www81.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XLyaM-0006Ld-NA; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:01:42 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Warren Block" , Fbsd8 Subject: Re: updating ezjails with freebs d-update References: <53FA18FD.1060309@a1poweruser.com> <53FB5082.40905@a1poweruser.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:01:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Michael Ross" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <53FB5082.40905@a1poweruser.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) X-Authenticated-Sender: gmx@ross.cx X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.98.4/19309/Mon Aug 25 17:21:25 2014) Cc: doug@safeport.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:01:53 -0000 On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:04:34 +0200, Fbsd8 wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >> Fbsd8 neglects to mention the history between ezjail and the qjail fork >> of it. A search on "ezjail and qjail" will help fill out the picture. >> > > Shame on you Warren. For someone who has worked so hard to earn the > respect of his peers and here you try to use slander in a effort to > discredit what I have posted in this thread. I know that you know that > is unacceptable behavior. > > Let me set the record straight once again. You claimed copyright for someone else's work, and told the original author that he is suffering from dementia. After this was discussed, you fixed the copyright attribution, but made your fork of his work proprietary: # # Before qjail may be forked, written permission must be # obtained from the author . # Your stance in the whole affair very much has a bearing, not on the facts, but on the ezjail-related opinions you voice here. Michael