From owner-freebsd-net Thu May 14 18:05:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA24882 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 May 1998 18:05:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (itojun@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA24747; Thu, 14 May 1998 18:04:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta12/3.6W/smtpfeed 0.63) with ESMTP id KAA12667; Fri, 15 May 1998 10:04:15 +0900 (JST) To: Pierre Beyssac cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Guido van Rooij , Peter Wemm , pete@sms.fi, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: pb's message of Fri, 15 May 1998 00:45:27 +0200. <19980515004527.B18577@fasterix.frmug.fr.net> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 10:04:15 +0900 Message-ID: <12663.895194255@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >It's true that the INRIA distribution method is rather unusual. >But believe it or not, it made my life much easier when porting >this to -current, because I had the complete original source files >at hand rather than having to download a full 2.2.5 source release. >I assume that's why this method was chosen. OTOH, for the end user, >this complicates the process a lot. >Anyway it's not difficult at all to generate patches from these, >that's what I do for my port to -current. would this be enough? :-) http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message