Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:55:51 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk> To: David Langford <langfod@dihelix.com> Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 430TX ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970414125432.1712C-100000@bagpuss.visint.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199704112024.KAA00588@caliban.dihelix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, David Langford wrote: > What I really dont understand is why HP and ALR(?) seem to be the only > folks doing memory busses larger than 64 bits wide. One would > think that a 128bit 4-way interleaved motherboard would really help > the crappy memory performance of Intel CPU based systems. How about most SGI machines ? take a look at this: http://www.sgi.com/Products/hardware/Power/challenge-xldata.html It's got a 256bit wide memory bus. I know I can't afford one though =) Steve Roome Technical Systems Manager, Vision Interactive Ltd. E: steve@visint.co.uk M: +44 (0) 976 241 342 T: +44 (0) 117 973 0597 F: +44 (0) 117 923 8522
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970414125432.1712C-100000>